Semanlink - NLP girls and guys ; NLP tasks / problems AND Transformers

Jerry Liu sur X : "This might be the first time ChatGPT (+@jxnlco) helped us come up with a better retrieval algorithm for RAG..."

Tags:

2023-08-28 About

Easily Finetune Llama 2 for Your Text-to-SQL Applications | by Jerry Liu | Aug, 2023

Tags:

2023-08-18 About

Jerry Liu sur Twitter : "Adding metadata to text can help w/ disambiguation and boost retrieval performance for LLM QA systems, using LLMs to... extract rich context to augment each chunk"

Tags:

2023-07-09 About

Build a ChatGPT with your Private Data using LlamaIndex and MongoDB | by Jerry Liu | LlamaIndex Blog | May, 2023 | Medium

Tags:

2023-05-21 About

Reinforcement Learning for Language Models

Tags:

> I was puzzled for a while as to why we need RL for LM training, rather than just using supervised instruct tuning. I now have a convincing argument, which is also reflected in a recent talk by @johnschulman2.

1st convincing argument:

> supervised learning allows only positive feedback (we show the model a series of questions and their correct answers) while **RL allows also for negative feedback** (the model is allowed to generate an answer an get a feedback saying "this is not correct")...if you as a learner are allowed to form your own hypotheses and ask the teacher if they are correct (as in the RL setting), even an adversarial teacher can no longer trick you into latching on to a wrong hypothesis.

2nd convincing argument is about knowledge-seeking queries

> we want to encourage the model to answer based on its internal knowledge, but we don't know what this internal knowledge contains. In supervised training, we present the model with a question and its correct answer, and train the model to replicate the provided answer... But if we are succeed in training the model to generalize in [the cases it doesn't know], then we essentially teaches the model to make stuff up! it actively encourages the model to "lie".

2023-04-23 About

Matthew Honnibal sur Twitter : "Some of the things ChatGPT can do are emergent behaviours... Other things it can do have been specifically taught to it. Is there some speculative list somewhere about what tasks were supervised?" / Twitter

Tags:

2023-01-14 About

Some remarks on Large Language Models

Tags:

> There turned out to be a phase shift somewhere between 60B parameters and 175B parameters, that made language models super impressive.

> **The performance of current days language models are not obtained by language modeling**
>
>    - [Traditional] LMs are not [grounded](tag:grounded_language_learning)
> 
> **3 conceptual steps between GPT-3 and chatGPT: Instructions, code, RLHF.** The last one is, I think, the least interesting despite getting the most attention
>
> Instruction tuning: For example, the human annotators would write something like "please summarize this text", followed by some text they got, followed by a summary they produced of this text. -> Some symbols ("summarize", "translate", "formal") are used in a consistent way together with the concept/task they denote. And they always appear in the beginning of the text. -> the act of producing a summary grounded to the human concept of "summary"
>
> code: programming language code data, and specifically data that contains both natural language instructions or descriptions (in the form of code comments) and the corresponding programming language code. This produced another very direct form of grounding. the human language describes concepts (or intents), which are then realized in the form of the corresponding programs.
>
> "[RL with Human Feedback](tag:reinforcement_learning_from_human_feedback)". This is a fancy way of saying that the model now observes two humans in a conversation, one playing the role of a user, and another playing the role of "the AI", demonstrating how the AI should respond in different situations. This clearly helps the model learn how dialogs work, and how to keep track of information across dialog states (something that is very hard to learn from just "found" data).

2023-01-03 About

Christopher Manning sur Twitter : "As the abilities of large pre-trained language models continue to rapidly improve, as seen in this week’s ChatGPT, I find it a rather implausible position to think that these models have no understanding of the meaning of texts."

Tags:

2022-12-03 About

[2205.11498] Domain Adaptation for Memory-Efficient Dense Retrieval

Tags:

2022-09-26 About

[2209.11055] Efficient Few-Shot Learning Without Prompts

Tags:

2022-09-23 About

Nils Reimers sur Twitter : "GPL goes multi-lingual..."

Tags:

2022-06-01 About

Ramsri Goutham Golla sur Twitter : "Hi @Nils_Reimers For GPL you used "msmarco-distilbert-base-tas-b" model and ..."

Tags:

2022-04-27 About

[1909.00426] Global Entity Disambiguation with BERT

Tags:

2022-04-18 About

[2110.08151] mLUKE: The Power of Entity Representations in Multilingual Pretrained Language Models

Tags:

[Ikuya Yamada sur Twitter : "Is entity representation effective to improve multilingual language models?..."](doc:2022/04/ikuya_yamada_sur_twitter_is_)

> Recent studies have shown that multilingual pretrained language models can be effectively improved with cross-lingual alignment information from Wikipedia entities. However, **existing methods only exploit entity information in pretraining and do not explicitly use entities in downstream tasks**. In this study, we explore the **effectiveness of leveraging entity representations for downstream cross-lingual tasks**.
>
> the key insight is that incorporating entity representations into the input allows us to extract more language-agnostic features.

[Github](https://github.com/studio-ousia/luke)

> Entity representations are known to enhance
language models in mono-lingual settings
(Zhang et al., 2019: [ERNIE](tag:ernie.html); Peters et al., 2019:  [[1909.04164] Knowledge Enhanced Contextual Word Representations](doc:2020/05/1909_04164_knowledge_enhanced); Wang et al.,
2021 [[1911.06136] KEPLER: A Unified Model for Knowledge Embedding and Pre-trained Language Representation](doc:2020/11/1911_06136_kepler_a_unified_); Xiong et al., 2020; Yamada et al., 2020: [[2010.01057] LUKE: Deep Contextualized Entity Representations with Entity-aware Self-attention](doc:2020/11/2010_01057_luke_deep_context))
presumably by introducing real-world knowledge.
We show that using entity representations facilitates
cross-lingual transfer by providing languageindependent
features.
>
> Multilingual extension of LUKE. The model is trained with the multilingual
masked language modeling (MLM) task as well
as the masked entity prediction (MEP) task with
Wikipedia entity embeddings

> We investigate two ways of using the entity representations
in cross-lingual transfer tasks:
> 1. perform
entity linking for the input text, and append
the detected entity tokens to the input sequence.
The entity tokens are expected to provide language independent
features to the model
> 2. use the entity
[MASK] token from the MEP task as a languageindependent
feature extractor.

2022-04-17 About

Ikuya Yamada sur Twitter : "Is entity representation effective to improve multilingual language models?..."

Tags:

2022-04-13 About

Sentence Transformer Fine-Tuning (SetFit): Outperforming GPT-3 on few-shot Text-Classification while being 1600 times smaller | by Moshe Wasserblat (2021-12)

Tags:

2022-03-31 About

Nils Reimers sur Twitter : "Great post on SetFit"

Tags:

2022-03-31 About

NAVER LABS Europe : "@Nils_Reimers of @huggingface on 'Unsupervised domain adaptation for neural search'"

Tags:

2022-03-09 About

Nils Reimers sur Twitter : "Creating intent classes for chatbots is challenging This tutorial shows how to use sentence-transformers to find potentially overlapping intent classes and how to improve your data annotation work." / Twitter

Tags:

2022-02-19 About

Nils Reimers sur Twitter : "how to use the fast clustering algorithm from sentence-transformers..."

Tags:

2022-02-19 About

[2112.07577] GPL: Generative Pseudo Labeling for Unsupervised Domain Adaptation of Dense Retrieval

Tags:

An unsupervised domain adaptation technique for dense retrieval models

1. synthetic queries
are generated for each passage from the target corpus (using an existing pre-trained [T5](tag:text_to_text_transfer_transformer)
encoder-decoder)
2. the generated queries are used for mining negative
passages (retrieving the most similar
paragraphs using an existing dense retrieval
model == hard negatives!)
3. the query-passage pairs are labeled by a cross-encoder and used to train the domain-adapted
dense retriever (using method described in [Hofstätter et al.,
2020](doc:2021/12/2010_02666_improving_efficien))

[Nils Reimers sur Twitter](doc:2021/12/nils_reimers_sur_twitter_do_), [GitHub](https://github.com/UKPLab/gpl),  by the author of [TSDAE](doc:2021/09/2104_06979_tsdae_using_trans)

Claims to improve "Doc2Query" [Document Expansion by Query Prediction](doc:2022/01/1904_08375_document_expansion): ([src](https://twitter.com/KexinWang2049/status/1471435779415150598))

> - GPL: Uses doc2query to construct synthetic data and does knowledge distillation (i.e. training) on that data.
> - Doc2query: Generates queries to extend the documents and use BM25 on top of them w/o training.

2021-12-15 About

Nils Reimers sur Twitter : EasyNMT Easy-to-use (3 lines of code), state-of-the-art neural machine translations

Tags:

2021-04-27 About

[1909.01259] Neural Attentive Bag-of-Entities Model for Text Classification

Tags:

A model that performs **text classification using entities in a knowledge base**.

> Entities provide unambiguous and relevant semantic signals that are beneficial for capturing semantics in texts. We combine **simple high-recall entity detection based on a dictionary** (word->list of entities), to detect entities in a document, with a novel neural **attention mechanism that enables the model to focus on a small number of unambiguous and relevant entities**.

2 steps:

1. Entity detection
2. Classification using the detected entities (+text) as inputs

Regarding entity linking, a local model which uses cosine
similarity between the embedding of the target
entity and the word-based representation of
the document to capture the relevance of an entity
given a document.

Embeddings from the KB: computed using [#Wikipedia2Vec](tag:wikipedia2vec) (similar words and entities
close to one another in a unified vector space)

Model using attention, with 2 features :

- cosine similarity between the
embedding of the entity and the word based
representation of the document
- the probability that the entity
name refers to the entity in KB.

Somewhat [related](doc:2020/01/investigating_entity_knowledge_)

### Conclusion:

>a neural
network model that performs text classification using
entities in Wikipedia. We combined simple
dictionary-based entity detection with a neural attention
mechanism to enable the model to focus
on a small number of unambiguous and relevant
entities in a document.

2020-09-02 About

Distilling BERT models with spaCy - Towards Data Science (2019)

Tags:

2020-02-15 About

[1909.04120] Span Selection Pre-training for Question Answering

Tags:

> a **new pre-training task inspired by reading
comprehension** and an **effort to avoid encoding general knowledge in the transformer network itself**

Current transformer architectures store general knowledge -> large models, long pre-training time. Better to offload the requirement of general knowledge to a sparsely activated network.

"Span selection" as an additional auxiliary task: the query is a sentence drawn from a corpus
with a term replaced with a special token: [BLANK]. The term replaced by the blank is the answer term. The passage is
relevant as determined by a BM25 search, and answer-bearing (containing the answer
term). Unlike BERT’s cloze task, where the answer must be drawn from the model itself, the answer is found in a passage
using language understanding.

> **We hope to progress to a model of general purpose language modeling that uses an indexed long
term memory to retrieve world knowledge, rather than holding it in the densely activated transformer encoder layers.**

2019-09-18 About

Attention and Memory in Deep Learning and NLP – WildML

Tags:

cf. visual attention

In standard [#seq2seq](/tag/sequence_to_sequence_learning) NMT, the decoder is supposed to generate a translation solely based on the last hidden state of the encoder - which therefore must capture everything from the source sentence (it must be a sentence embedding). Not good. Hence the attention mechanism.

> we allow the decoder to “attend” to different parts of the source sentence at each step of the output generation. Importantly, we let the model learn what to attend to based on the input sentence and what it has produced so far

> each decoder output word now depends on a weighted combination of all the input states, not just the last state.

Possible to interpret what the model is doing by looking at the Attention weight matrix

Cost: We need to calculate an attention value for each combination of input and output word (-> attention is a bit of a misnomer: we look at everything in details before deciding what to focus on)

> attention mechanism is simply giving the network access to its internal memory, which is the hidden state of the encoder

> Unlike typical memory, the memory access mechanism here is soft, which means that the network retrieves a weighted combination of all memory locations, not a value from a single discrete location

2016-01-03 About