Semanlink - Information retrieval ; NLP Teams AND Question Answering

[2304.09848] Evaluating Verifiability in Generative Search Engines

Tags:

2023-04-23 About

Domain Adaptation with Generative Pseudo-Labeling (GPL) | Pinecone

Tags:

2023-04-09 About

Stanford NLP Group sur Twitter : "YONO: You Only Need One Model for Open-domain Question Answering..."

Tags:

2022-12-05 About

[2205.11498] Domain Adaptation for Memory-Efficient Dense Retrieval

Tags:

2022-09-26 About

[2206.10658] Questions Are All You Need to Train a Dense Passage Retriever

Tags:

> **approach for training dense retrieval models that does not require any labeled training data**. Dense retrieval is a central challenge for open-domain tasks, such as Open QA, where state-of-the-art methods typically require large supervised datasets with custom hard-negative mining and denoising of positive examples.
>
> ART, in contrast, only requires access to unpaired inputs and outputs (e.g. questions and potential answer documents).
>
> It uses a new document-retrieval autoencoding scheme, where
> 1. an input question is used to retrieve a set of evidence documents, and
> 2. the documents are then used to compute the probability of reconstructing the original question.
>
> Training for retrieval based on question reconstruction enables effective unsupervised learning of both document and question encoders, which can be later incorporated into complete Open QA systems without any further finetuning.

[Tweet](doc:2022/07/devendra_singh_sachan_sur_twitt)

> Given an
input question, ART first retrieves a small set
of possible evidences documents. It then recon
structs
the original question by attending to these
documents
>
> The
key idea in ART is to consider the retrieved documents
as a noisy representation of the original
question and question reconstruction probability
as a way of denoising that provides soft-labels for
how likely each document is to have been the correct
result

Refers to [[IZACARD 2012.04584] Distilling Knowledge from Reader to Retriever for Question Answering](doc:2020/12/2012_04584_distilling_knowled)

2022-07-06 About

NAVER LABS Europe : "@Nils_Reimers of @huggingface on 'Unsupervised domain adaptation for neural search'"

Tags:

2022-03-09 About

Integrate ORQA and REALM for Open Domain Question Answering · Issue #312 · deepset-ai/haystack

Tags:

2022-01-12 About

[2112.07577] GPL: Generative Pseudo Labeling for Unsupervised Domain Adaptation of Dense Retrieval

Tags:

An unsupervised domain adaptation technique for dense retrieval models

1. synthetic queries
are generated for each passage from the target corpus (using an existing pre-trained [T5](tag:text_to_text_transfer_transformer)
encoder-decoder)
2. the generated queries are used for mining negative
passages (retrieving the most similar
paragraphs using an existing dense retrieval
model == hard negatives!)
3. the query-passage pairs are labeled by a cross-encoder and used to train the domain-adapted
dense retriever (using method described in [Hofstätter et al.,
2020](doc:2021/12/2010_02666_improving_efficien))

[Nils Reimers sur Twitter](doc:2021/12/nils_reimers_sur_twitter_do_), [GitHub](https://github.com/UKPLab/gpl),  by the author of [TSDAE](doc:2021/09/2104_06979_tsdae_using_trans)

Claims to improve "Doc2Query" [Document Expansion by Query Prediction](doc:2022/01/1904_08375_document_expansion): ([src](https://twitter.com/KexinWang2049/status/1471435779415150598))

> - GPL: Uses doc2query to construct synthetic data and does knowledge distillation (i.e. training) on that data.
> - Doc2query: Generates queries to extend the documents and use BM25 on top of them w/o training.

2021-12-15 About

[2004.04906] Dense Passage Retrieval for Open-Domain Question Answering

Tags:

2021-06-03 About

[2012.04584] Distilling Knowledge from Reader to Retriever for Question Answering

Tags:

> a method to train an information retrieval module for downstream tasks, **without using pairs of queries and documents as annotations**.

Uses two models (standard pipeline for open-domain QA):

- the first one retrieves documents from a large source of knowledge (the retriever)
- the second one processes the support documents to solve the task (the reader).

> First the retriever selects support passages in a large knowledge
source. Then these passages are processed by the reader, along with the question, to generate an
answer

Inspired by knowledge distillation: the reader model is the teacher and the retriever is the student.

> More precisely, we use a sequence-to-sequence model as the reader, and use
the attention activations over the input documents as synthetic labels to train the retriever. 
> (**train the retriever by learning to approximate the attention score of the reader**)

Refers to:

- [REALM: Retrieval-Augmented Language Model Pre-Training](doc:2020/12/2002_08909_realm_retrieval_a)
- [Dehghani: Neural Ranking Models with Weak Supervision](doc:?uri=https%3A%2F%2Farxiv.org%2Fabs%2F1704.08803)

2020-12-11 About

[1912.08904] Macaw: An Extensible Conversational Information Seeking Platform

Tags:

2020-01-01 About