Semanlink - Favoris ; Semantic technology AND Hierarchies in ML

> we study the taxonomy expansion task: given an
existing taxonomy and a set of new emerging concepts, we aim
to automatically expand the taxonomy to incorporate these new
concepts (without changing the existing relations in the given taxonomy).

> To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study on **how to
expand an existing directed acyclic graph (as we model a taxonomy
as a DAG) using self-supervised learning**.

Self-supervised framework, the existing taxonomy being used as training data: it learns a model to predict whether a query concept is the direct hyponym of an anchor concept.

> 2 techniques:
>
> 1. a **position-enhanced graph neural network that encodes the local structure of an anchor concept** in the existing taxonomy,
> 2. a noise-robust training objective that enables the learned model to be insensitive to the label noise in the self-supervision data.

Regarding 1: uses [GNN](/tag/graph_neural_networks.html) to model the "ego network" of concepts (potential “siblings”
and “grand parents” of the query concept).

> Regular
GNNs fail to distinguish nodes with different relative positions to
the query (i.e., some nodes are grand parents of the query while
the others are siblings of the query). To address this limitation, we
present a simple but effective enhancement to inject such position
information into GNNs using position embedding. We show that
such embedding can be easily integrated with existing GNN architectures
(e.g., [GCN](/tag/graph_convolutional_networks) and GAT) and significantly boosts the
prediction performance

Regarding point 2: uses InfoNCE loss, cf. [Contrastive Predictive Coding](/doc/?uri=https%3A%2F%2Farxiv.org%2Fabs%2F1807.03748)

> Instead of predicting
whether each individual ⟨query concept, anchor concept⟩ pair
is positive or not, we first group all pairs sharing the same query
concept into a single training instance and learn a model to select
the positive pair among other negative ones from the group.

(Hum, ça me rappelle quelque chose)

> assume each concept (in existing taxonomy + set of new concepts) has an initial embedding
vector learned from some text associated with this concept.

To keep things tractable, only attempts to find a single parent node of each new concept.

2020-04-25 About

Semantic Text Matching for Long-Form Documents (2019)

Tags:

2020-01-23 About

[1910.03524] Beyond Vector Spaces: Compact Data Representation as Differentiable Weighted Graphs

Tags:

2019-10-09 About

HyperE: Hyperbolic Embeddings for Entities

Tags:

2018-07-27 About

Tutorial on Poincaré Embeddings (Jupyter Notebook )

Tags:

2018-05-20 About

Implementing Poincaré Embeddings | RARE Technologies

Tags:

2018-05-20 About

[1607.07956] Joint Embedding of Hierarchical Categories and Entities for Concept Categorization and Dataless Classification (COLING 2016)

Tags:

2018-05-12 About

RESEARCH TRACK: Web Content Analysis, Semantics and Knowledge

Tags:

[CFP](https://www2018.thewebconf.org/call-for-papers/research-tracks-cfp/web-content-analysis/)

> In previous years, ‘content analysis’ and ‘semantic and knowledge’ were in separate track. This year, we combined these tracks to emphasize the close relationship between these topics; **the use of content to curate knowledge and the use of knowledge to guide content analysis and intelligent usage**.

Some of the accepted papers:
### [Large-Scale Hierarchical Text Classification with Recursively Regularized Deep Graph-CNN](https://doi.org/10.1145/3178876.3186005)

[Hierarchical Text Classification](/tag/nlp_hierarchical_text_classification): Text classification to a hierarchical taxonomy of topics, using graph representation of text, and CNN over this graph

Renvoie à ce qui a été vu dans le tutorial "Graph-based Text Representations"

from the abstract:

> a graph-CNN based deep learning model to first convert texts to graph-of-words, and then use graph convolution operations to convolve the word graph. Graph-of-words representation of texts has the advantage of capturing non-consecutive and long-distance semantics. CNN models have the advantage of learning different level of semantics. To further leverage the hierarchy of labels, we regularize the deep architecture with the dependency among labels

Conversion of text to graph: potentially given a single document

### [Weakly-supervised Relation Extraction by Pattern-enhanced Embedding Learning](https://doi.org/10.1145/3178876.3186024 )

Extraction de relations de corpus de textes de façon semi-supervisée, dans un contexte où on a peu de données labellisées décrivant les relations.

Par exemple, des données labellisées indique que le texte "Beijing, capital of China" correspond à la relation entre entités : ("Beijing", "Capital Of", "China), et on voudrait pouvoir extraire les entités et relations pertinentes à partir de texte tel que "Paris, France's capital,..."

Le papier décrit une méthode qui combine deux modules, l'un basé sur l'extraction automatique de patterns (par ex "[Head], Capital Of [Tail]") et l'autre sur la "sémantique distributionnelle" (du type "word embeddings"). Ces deux modules collaborent, le premier permettant de créer des instances de relations augmentant la base de connaissance sur lequel entrainer le second, et le second aidant le premier à déterminer des patterns informatifs ("co-entrainement")

### [Scalable Instance Reconstruction in Knowledge Bases via Relatedness Affiliated Embedding](https://doi.org/10.1145/3178876.3186017)

Knowledge base completion problem: usually, it is formulated as a link prediction problem, but not here. A novel knowledge embedding model ("Joint Modelling and Learning of Relatedness and Embedding")

### [Improving Word Embedding Compositionality using Lexicographic Definitions](https://doi.org/10.1145/3178876.3186007)

comment obtenir les meilleures représentations de texte à partir de représentations de mots (word embeddings) ? L'auteur utilise des ressources lexicographiques (wordnet) pour ses tests : l'embedding obtenu pour la définition d'un mot est-il proche de celui du mot ?

Le papier s'appuie sur une [thèse du même auteur](https://esc.fnwi.uva.nl/thesis/centraal/files/f1554608041.pdf), claire et bien écrite.

### [CESI: Canonicalizing Open Knowledge Bases using Embeddings and Side Information](https://doi.org/10.1145/3178876.3186030)

Amélioration de l'extraction de triplets (nom phrase, property, nom phrase) à partir de texte en calculant des embeddings pour les "nom phrases" (~entités)

### [Short-Text Topic Modeling via Non-negative Matrix Factorization Enriched with Local Word-Context Correlations](https://doi.org/10.1145/3178876.3186009)

Topic modeling for short texts, leveraging the word-context semantic correlations in the training

### [Towards Annotating Relational Data on the Web with Language Models](https://doi.org/10.1145/3178876.3186029)

### A paper by [David Blei](/tag/david_blei): (Dynamic Embeddings for Language Evolution)

2018-01-27 About

[1705.08039] Poincaré Embeddings for Learning Hierarchical Representations

Tags: