Semanlink - Tagging AND Machine learning

> for each unseen instance, its K nearest neighbors in the training set are firstly identified. After that, based on statistical information gained from the label sets of these neighboring instances, i.e. the number of neighboring instances belonging to each possible class, [Maximum a posteriori (MAP)](tag:maximum_a_posteriori_estimation) principle is utilized to determine the label set for the unseen instance.

Implemented in [scikit-multilearn](http://scikit.ml/api/skmultilearn.adapt.mlknn.html), in [java](https://github.com/lefman/mulan-extended/blob/master/mulan/src/mulan/classifier/lazy/MLkNN.java)

> the first lazy approach proposed specifically for multi-label classification. This is also a binary relevance approach which considers each label independently as a binary classification problem. Instead of a standard k-NN method, however, MLkNN uses the maximum a-posteriori (MAP) (Kelleher et al., 2015) approach combined with k-NN. [src](https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/af9b/33da37d290c063cd826ab5923d96892a9767.pdf)

2018-03-18 About

Extreme Multi-label Learning with Label Features for Warm-start Tagging, Ranking & Recommendation (2018)

Tags:

2018-03-04 About

Efficient unsupervised keywords extraction using graphs

Tags:

2017-10-04 About

Enriching Word Embeddings Using Knowledge Graph for Semantic Tagging in Conversational Dialog Systems - Microsoft Research (2015)

Tags:

> new simple, yet effective approaches to
learn domain specific word embeddings.

## Intro

> Adapting word embeddings, such as jointly capturing
syntactic and semantic information, can further enrich semantic
word representations for several tasks, e.g., sentiment
analysis (Tang et al. 2014), named entity recognition
(Lebret, Legrand, and Collobert 2013), entity-relation extraction
(Weston et al. 2013), etc. (Yu and Dredze 2014)
has introduced a lightly supervised word embedding learning
extending word2vec. They incorporate prior information to the objective
function as a regularization term considering synonymy relations
between words from Wordnet (Fellbaum 1999).

> In this work, we go one step further and investigate if
enriching the word2vec word embeddings trained on unstructured/
unlabeled text with domain specific semantic relations
obtained from knowledge sources (e.g., knowledge
graphs, search query logs, etc.) can help to discover relation
aware word embeddings. Unlike earlier work, **we encode the
information about the relations between phrases, thereby,
entities and relation mentions are all embedded into a low dimensional
vector space**.

## Related work (Learning Word Embeddings with Priors)

- word2vec
- Relational Constrained Model (RTM) (Yu and Dredze 2014)
While CBOW learns lexical word embeddings from provided text, the RTM learns embeddings of words based on their similarity to other words provided by a knowledge resource (eg. wordnet)
- Joint model  (Yu and Dredze 2014)
combines CBOW and RTM through linear combination

2017-10-02 About

What is a simple but detailed explanation of Textrank? - Quora

Tags: