Semanlink - Favoris ; Semantic technology AND Chatbots

> The Two-Tower model pairs similar types of objects, such as user profiles, search queries, web documents, answer passages, or images, in the same vector space, so that related items are close to each other. **The Two-Tower model consists of two encoder towers: the query tower and the candidate tower**. These towers embed independent items into a shared embedding space, which lets Matching Engine retrieve similarly matched items.
>
> To train a Two-Tower model, Google uses **pairs of relevant items**. Each pair consists of a query document and a candidate document. Documents contain arbitrary customer-defined features including text, numeric, and categorical features. After training, the Two-Tower built-in algorithm exports two TensorFlow SavedModels—a query encoder and a candidate encoder... Given a query item, Matching Engine uses the query encoder to generate a query embedding, and uses the index to find similar candidate embeddings. Matching Engine uses the candidate encoder to index all the items and serve them by using an approximate nearest neighbor solution.

2021-11-04 About

Agostina Calabrese sur Twitter : Structured Sentiment Analysis as Dependency Graph Parsing

Tags:

2021-08-02 About

Learning to Tag OOV Tokens by Integrating Contextual Representation and Background Knowledge (ACL Anthology 2020)

Tags:

Aim to leverage both contextual representation of input text (deep LMs)  and  knowledge derived
from curated KBs ([Wordnet](tag:wordnet)) to improve [slot tagging](tag:slot_tagging) in the presence of [out-of-vocab](tag:oov) words ([few-shot scenario](tag:few_shot_learning))

Method:

1. retrieve potentially relevant KB entities and
encode them into distributed representations that
describe global graph-structured information
2. BERT encoder
layer to capture context-aware representations of
the sequence and attend to the KB embeddings
using multi-level graph attention
3. integrate
BERT embeddings and the KB embeddings
to predict the slot type

Contributions:

1. feasibility of applying lexical ontology
to facilitate recognizing OOV words. First to consider the large-scale background
knowledge for enhancing context-aware
slot tagging models.
2. a knowledge integration mechanism that uses multi-level graph
attention to model explicit lexical relations.
3.experiments on two benchmark datasets

> our method makes a notable difference in a
scenario where samples are linguistically diverse,
and large vocab exists.

(Better improvements when using RNN than BERT, because BERT already contains a lot of background knowledge)

2020-07-04 About

Joint Intent Classification and Slot Filling with Transformers (Jupyter Notebook Viewer)

Tags:

2020-01-09 About

[1902.10909] BERT for Joint Intent Classification and Slot Filling

Tags:

2020-01-09 About

Natural Language Understanding with Sequence to Sequence Models

Tags:

2020-01-09 About

[1912.08904] Macaw: An Extensible Conversational Information Seeking Platform

Tags:

2020-01-01 About

Les chatbots sont morts, vive les médias 100% messagerie !

Tags:

2019-12-15 About

Détection d'intention: application industrielle d'un projet de recherche

Tags:

2019-12-14 About

State-of-the-art neural coreference resolution for chatbots

Tags:

2019-05-28 About

Passage AI Conversational Chatbot with AI/NLP by Passage AI

Tags:

2019-03-26 About

Deep Chit-Chat: deep learning for chatbots (EMNLP 2018 Tutorial)

Tags:

by Dr Wei Wu (Microsoft Xiaolce - chatbot with 200 millions users in China) and Dr Rui Yan (Peking Univ)

- Chit-chat (casual, non goal oriented) open-domain. Must be relevant to the context and diverse (informative) to be engaging.
- why creating a chat? to prove an AI can speak like a human, commercial reasons, link to services.

Task oriented vs non task oriented: this tutorial is about the second one.

Retrieval based vs generation based.

Basic knowledge of DL for chatbots:

- word embeddings
- sentence embeddings (CNN, RNN)
- dialogue modeling: seq-to-seq with attention

Response selection for retrieval based chatbots:

- single turn response selection (slides 37-57)
    - framework 1: matching with seq embeddings
    - framework 2: matching with message-response interaction (46)
    - extension of 1: KnowledgeMatching with External Knowledge (53)
    - extension of 2: RepresentationsMatching with Multiple Levels of Representations (54)
    - insights from comparison between 1 and 2 (57)
- multi turn response selection (62)
    - context is now: mess + history
    - again, 2 frameworks

Emerging directions (79):

- matching with better representations
    - Self-Attention (82)
    - fusing multiple types of repr. But how to fuse matters (83)
    - pre-training

Learning a matching model for response selection (84)

Generation based models for chatbots:

- single turn generarion (89)
    - Basic generation model
        - seq2seq
        - Attention
        - Bi-directional modeling
- multi turn generation
    - Contexts are important
    - Context sensitive models
    - Hierarchical context modeling
    - Latent variable modeling
    - Hierarchical memory networks

Diversity in conversations (99)

Content introducing (106)

Additional elements (113)

- Topics in cnversation
- Emotions

Persona in chat:

- Persona
- ...
- Knowledge
- Common sense

RL and Adversarial learning in conversations (125)

Evaluation (132)

Future trends:

- Reasoning in dialogues
- X-grounded dialogues

2018-11-06 About

Chatbots were the next big thing: what happened? – The Startup – Medium

Tags:

Chatbots

2018-06-08 About

What happened when a professor built a chatbot to be his teaching assistant - The Washington Post

Tags:

2016-05-14 About