Semanlink - AI@Google AND AI@Meta

Google "We Have No Moat, And Neither Does OpenAI"

Tags:

> low-cost public involvement was enabled
by a vastly cheaper mechanism for fine tuning called low
rank adaptation ()[LoRA](tag:lora)

> **Part of what makes LoRA so effective is that ... it’s stackable.**
>
> By contrast, training giant models from scratch not only
throws away the pretraining, but also any iterative
improvements that have been made on top.

> LoRA updates are very cheap to produce (~$100) for the
most popular model sizes.

> Many of these projects are saving time by training on
small, highly curated datasets...
> These
datasets are built using synthetic methods (e.g. filtering
the best responses from an existing model) and
scavenging from other projects

> Directly Competing With Open Source
Is a Losing Proposition

> Paradoxically, the one clear winner in all of this is Meta.
Because the leaked model was theirs ([LLaMA](tag:llama)), they have
effectively garnered an entire planet's worth of free labor.
Since most open source innovation is happening on top of
their architecture, there is nothing stopping them from
directly incorporating it into their products.

2023-05-04 A propos

Daniel Vila Suero sur Twitter : "Data quality is key for LLMs, but we're building Open Source LLMs with data of "unknown" quality... Introducing Alpaca GarbageCollector..."

Tags:

2023-04-05 A propos

AlphaFold’s new rival? Meta AI predicts shape of 600 million proteins

Tags:

2023-01-11 A propos

[2206.10658] Questions Are All You Need to Train a Dense Passage Retriever

Tags:

> **approach for training dense retrieval models that does not require any labeled training data**. Dense retrieval is a central challenge for open-domain tasks, such as Open QA, where state-of-the-art methods typically require large supervised datasets with custom hard-negative mining and denoising of positive examples.
>
> ART, in contrast, only requires access to unpaired inputs and outputs (e.g. questions and potential answer documents).
>
> It uses a new document-retrieval autoencoding scheme, where
> 1. an input question is used to retrieve a set of evidence documents, and
> 2. the documents are then used to compute the probability of reconstructing the original question.
>
> Training for retrieval based on question reconstruction enables effective unsupervised learning of both document and question encoders, which can be later incorporated into complete Open QA systems without any further finetuning.

[Tweet](doc:2022/07/devendra_singh_sachan_sur_twitt)

> Given an
input question, ART first retrieves a small set
of possible evidences documents. It then recon
structs
the original question by attending to these
documents
>
> The
key idea in ART is to consider the retrieved documents
as a noisy representation of the original
question and question reconstruction probability
as a way of denoising that provides soft-labels for
how likely each document is to have been the correct
result

Refers to [[IZACARD 2012.04584] Distilling Knowledge from Reader to Retriever for Question Answering](doc:2020/12/2012_04584_distilling_knowled)

2022-07-06 A propos

Sentence Embedding Fine-tuning for the French Language | by La Javaness R&D | Feb, 2022 | Medium

Tags:

2022-03-31 A propos

Sahajtomar/french_semantic · Hugging Face

Tags: